Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions
Demanding tasks often require a series of decisions to reach a goal. Recent progress in perceptual decision-making has served to unite decision accuracy, speed, and confidence in a common framework of bounded evidence accumulation, furnishing a platform for the study of such multi-stage decisions. In many instances, the strategy applied to each decision, such as the speed-accuracy trade-off, ou...
متن کامل1. Design Decisions: The Bridge between Rationale and Architecture
Software architecture can be seen as a decision making process; it involves making the right decisions at the right time. Typically, these design decisions are not explicitly represented in the artifacts describing the design. They reside in the minds of the designers and are therefore easily lost. Rationale management is often proposed as a solution, but lacks a close relationship with softwar...
متن کاملConfidence in Interactive Decisions
When the conditions of a competitive market are simulated in a game, the number of people deciding to enter each round approaches the game-theoretic equilibrium after a few rounds. This occurs even when there is no communication between players, and the only feedback on each round relates to the number of entrants. However, in real markets entry is generally too high, resulting in too many star...
متن کاملUsing Confidence Vector in Multi-Stage Speech Recognition
This paper presents a new method of using confidence vector as an intermediate input feature for the multi-stage based speech recognition. The multi-stage based speech recognition is a method to reduce the computational complexity of the decoding procedure and thus accomplish faster speech recognition. In the multi-stage speech recognition, however, the error of previous stage is transferred to...
متن کاملThe Algorithmic Level Is the Bridge Between Computation and Brain
Every scientist chooses a preferred level of analysis and this choice shapes the research program, even determining what counts as evidence. This contribution revisits Marr's (1982) three levels of analysis (implementation, algorithmic, and computational) and evaluates the prospect of making progress at each individual level. After reviewing limitations of theorizing within a level, two strateg...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Current Biology
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0960-9822
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.021